A paper focusing on similarly aged forest stands in Maine and the Catskills will be set up differently from one comparing a new forest stand in the White Mountains with an old forest in the same region. In a paper comparing the effects of acid rain on two forest sites, your choice of sites is less obvious. For instance, in a paper asking how the "discourse of domesticity" has been used in the abortion debate, the grounds for comparison are obvious the issue has two conflicting sides, pro-choice and pro-life. Why these particular fruits? Why not pears and bananas? The rationale behind your choice, the grounds for comparison, lets your reader know why your choice is deliberate and meaningful, not random. Grounds for Comparison. Let's say you're writing a paper on global food distribution, and you've chosen to compare apples and oranges. If you encounter an assignment that fails to provide a frame of reference, you must come up with one on your own. A paper without such a context would have no angle on the material, no focus or frame for the writer to propose a meaningful argument. Most assignments tell you exactly what the frame of reference should be, and most courses supply sources for constructing it. Thus, in a paper comparing how two writers redefine social norms of masculinity, you would be better off quoting a sociologist on the topic of masculinity than spinning out potentially banal-sounding theories of your own. The best frames of reference are constructed from specific sources rather than your own thoughts or observations. The frame of reference may consist of an idea, theme, question, problem, or theory a group of similar things from which you extract two for special attention biographical or historical information. Here are the five elements required.įrame of Reference. This is the context within which you place the two things you plan to compare and contrast it is the umbrella under which you have grouped them. To write a good compare-and-contrast paper, you must take your raw data-the similarities and differences you've observed-and make them cohere into a meaningful argument. Predictably, the thesis of such a paper is usually an assertion that A and B are very similar yet not so similar after all. Often, lens comparisons take time into account: earlier texts, events, or historical figures may illuminate later ones, and vice versa.įaced with a daunting list of seemingly unrelated similarities and differences, you may feel confused about how to construct a paper that isn't just a mechanical exercise in which you first state all the features that A and B have in common, and then state all the ways in which A and B are different. Lens comparisons are useful for illuminating, critiquing, or challenging the stability of a thing that, before the analysis, seemed perfectly understood. Just as looking through a pair of glasses changes the way you see an object, using A as a framework for understanding B changes the way you see B. In the "lens" (or "keyhole") comparison, in which you weight A less heavily than B, you use A as a lens through which to view B. "Classic" compare-and-contrast papers, in which you weight A and B equally, may be about two similar things that have crucial differences (two pesticides with different effects on the environment) or two similar things that have crucial differences, yet turn out to have surprising commonalities (two politicians with vastly different world views who voice unexpectedly similar perspectives on sexual harassment). Throughout your academic career, you'll be asked to write papers in which you compare and contrast two things: two texts, two theories, two historical figures, two scientific processes, and so on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |